• Users Online: 168
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 13-18

Two versus five bilateral local anesthetic injections for submucosal resection: a randomized double-blind clinical trial


1 Department of Anesthesia, Makassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
2 Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon

Correspondence Address:
MD, PhD Zoher Naja
Department of Anesthesia, Makassed General Hospital, Beirut, Postal Code: 11-6301 Riad El-Solh Beirut 11072210
Lebanon
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/roaic.roaic_88_20

Rights and Permissions

Background Submucous resection (SMR) is performed under general anesthesia, local anesthesia, or a combination of both. The combination was associated with less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of two versus five bilateral local anesthetic injections in terms of postoperative pain relief at 24 h postoperatively. Patients and methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted at a tertiary care center between May 2015 and December 2016. Patients aged between 15 and 63 years scheduled for elective SMR of the nasal septum were included. Eligible patients received general anesthesia and were randomly assigned to receive either two or five bilateral local anesthetic injections. The primary outcome was pain assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale. Other outcomes were hemodynamic stability, analgesic consumption, nausea and vomiting, as well as patient’s and surgeon’s satisfaction. Results A total of 120 patients were included in the study and were divided equally into the two groups. Both groups were similar in terms of age, height, weight, surgery duration, and hemodynamic characteristics. There was no significant difference for both groups in pain scores at 24 h (1.53±1.25 vs. 2.07±1.82, P=0.069 for two vs. five injections, respectively) and over the 10 postoperative days. Similarly, the number of patients who consumed analgesics was similar between the two groups. Conclusion The present study revealed that two bilateral local anesthetic injections at the suprazygomatic and infraorbital areas could be an alternative to five injections in patients undergoing SMR.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed253    
    Printed30    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded46    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal