• Users Online: 488
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 119-124

General versus spinal anesthesia during elective cesarean section in term low-risk pregnancy as regards maternal and neonatal outcomes: a prospective, controlled clinical trial


1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
2 Department of Anesthesia and Surgical ICU, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Nadia M Madkour
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 35842
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/roaic.roaic_104_17

Rights and Permissions

Objective The objective of this study was to compare general and spinal anesthesia as regards its maternal and neonatal outcomes in low-risk pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean section (C-section) at term. Patients and methods In a prospective, controlled clinical trial, 64 low-risk pregnant women underwent elective C-section for the first time for variant indications. The included women were randomly divided into two groups; group I (n=32) received spinal anesthesia and group II (n=32) received general anesthesia. The distinction between preoperative and postoperative maternal hematological indices, intraoperative and postoperative maternal hemodynamic parameters, the maternal requirement for analgesia, return of bowel function, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results The mean time for bowel to be open (9.7±1.3 vs. 6.8±1.6 h, P=0.001), and the first analgesia requirement was significantly (5.33±4 vs. 2.91±2.16 h, P=0.004) longer, and the hemoglobin and hematocrit difference values at 24 h postoperative were significantly (P=0.03, and 0.02, respectively) larger in group II. Urine output at the first postoperative hour was more (P=0.002) in the spinal group. The median Apgar scores at the first minute and at fifth minute were significantly higher (P=0.001, and 0.005, respectively) in the spinal group. Conclusion As long as it is not contraindicated, spinal anesthesia during elective C-section was safer for both neonates (higher Apgar scores), and mother (less bleeding, less postoperative pain) than general anesthesia and can be the ideal anesthesia and method of choice during elective C-section.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1934    
    Printed50    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded166    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal